Starting from your cases
The trainer looks at what your teams do before preparing, and builds the exercises on your real files.
AI training in the workplace is meant to make teams self-sufficient on their own work, not to introduce them to a tool. The formats that change something start from the real tasks of the job concerned and are measured afterwards; the others boil down to a demo.
The classic scenario: the company has paid for licences, some of the teams use them to rephrase emails, and no one gets out of them what was expected. The problem is rarely the tool — it is that no one has shown what it is for in that particular job.
Useful training does not present AI in general. It starts from your teams’ real tasks, and ends with ways of working people apply the next day. The rest is general knowledge.
225 providers in the directory cover this need. You pay nothing, neither to search nor if you hire one of them.
The trainer looks at what your teams do before preparing, and builds the exercises on your real files.
This is the skill that makes the difference between a disappointing tool and a useful one. It can be learned, with examples from your line of work.
What you do not put into an AI tool, how to check an answer, what falls under professional confidentiality or personal data.
Good-practice sheets, sample prompts, written internal rules — without which everything falls away within three weeks.
If your case is not on this list, describe it anyway: we will tell you honestly whether it falls within what our providers know how to do.
€0
to post your project, receive qualified providers and talk with them.
And €0 too if you hire one of them: Claude Partners is paid by the provider you choose, at 20% of the engagement amount excluding VAT. Nothing is added to the quote you receive.
See pricing in detailFour answers are enough to turn an intention into a request that can be qualified — and to get comparable quotes rather than a gap of 1 to 10 between two providers.
The same content does not suit lawyers and salespeople. Specify the roles.
Some have never opened the tool, others already use it every day. A group that is too mixed bores everyone.
Half a day raises awareness. Changing practices usually takes several short, spaced-out sessions.
If nothing is written down about what is allowed, the training should start there.
Two hours of spectacular examples change no practice at all. Insist on exercises using your own files.
A pilot group, then internal champions, holds up better over time than one big one-off event.
If no rule is written down, teams will use the tools on the quiet, with the risks that entails.
No account to create. We get back to you within 48 business hours, even to say no.