Bringing your sources together
File server, SharePoint, Notion, mailboxes, scanned PDFs: making them readable by the machine, even when they are badly organised.
Your teams spend a considerable amount of time looking for information that already exists: the right version of a procedure, a clause in a contract, the decision taken eight months ago. The problem is not that the information is missing, it is that it cannot be found.
The technical solution has a name you will see everywhere: RAG, for “retrieval-augmented generation”. Put simply: the AI first looks for the relevant passages in your documents, then answers based on them, citing its sources. That is what stops it from making things up.
149 providers in the directory cover this need. You pay nothing, neither to search nor if you hire one of them.
File server, SharePoint, Notion, mailboxes, scanned PDFs: making them readable by the machine, even when they are badly organised.
Every answer points to the document and the exact passage, so you can check it in one click.
Everyone should see only what they are allowed to see. This is the part failed projects most often forget.
A knowledge base frozen on delivery day becomes wrong again within three months. You need to plan how new documents get in.
If your case is not on this list, describe it anyway: we will tell you honestly whether it falls within what our providers know how to do.
€0
to post your project, receive qualified providers and talk with them.
And €0 too if you hire one of them: Claude Partners is paid by the provider you choose, at 20% of the engagement amount excluding VAT. Nothing is added to the quote you receive.
See pricing in detailFour answers are enough to turn an intention into a request that can be qualified — and to get comparable quotes rather than a gap of 1 to 10 between two providers.
An order of magnitude is enough: 500 Word files, 20 years of emails, 3,000 scanned PDFs. Scanned documents cost more than text.
If not everyone should see everything, say so from the first conversation: it changes the architecture, it is not an end-of-project setting.
Give three real questions your teams ask themselves. They will be used to measure whether the result is good.
A knowledge base is a living service, not a deliverable you drop off.
Three contradictory versions of a procedure will give three contradictory answers. Sorting beforehand is part of the project.
A system that does not cite its documents cannot be checked, so it cannot be used on a subject where something is at stake.
Fixing it after the fact often costs more than the original project.
No account to create. We get back to you within 48 business hours, even to say no.